A defense-focused digital forensics expert dissects call detail records, smartphone extractions, and cloud data to reveal exculpatory evidence, challenge prosecution timelines, and prepare Daubert-defensible testimony.

CDRs are admissible but show only tower‐level location. We add pattern-of-life analysis and device usage context to evaluate whether proximity claims are reliable or misleading.

Pattern-of-life analysis compares historical tower usage and app activity to test whether a device’s presence at a crime scene aligns with its normal behavior—often exposing false “phone was there” assumptions.

Yes. Reader displays only the data parsed by Cellebrite. Phone extractions contain a significant amount of data not parsed by any of the tools so, analyzing the data with the forensic tool, not the Reader, is important in every case. 

Expedited analysis is available in as little as five business days, depending on data volume and discovery status.

We convert multi-gigabyte PDF or JSON returns into searchable datasets, isolate relevant conversations, and provide annotated exhibits for impeachment or exculpation.

Our lead analyst is a former DA investigator, certified CellHawk instructor, and has been accepted under Daubert and Frye standards in state and federal courts.

Yes. Objective reporting—favorable or not—prevents courtroom surprises and guides realistic plea or trial strategy.